Monday, 15 August 2016

EVALUATION OF TABLETS

1. Size  & Shape: It can be dimensionally described & controlled. The thickness of a tablet  is only variables. Tablet thickness can be measured by micrometer or by other device. Tablet thickness should be controlled within a ± 5% variation of standard value.

2. Unique identification marking: These marking utilize some  form  of embossing, engraving or printing. These markings include company name  or symbol, product code, product name  etc.

3. Organoleptic properties:  Color distribution  must be uniform with no mottling. For visual color comparison compare the color of sample against standard color.
The presence of odor in a batch of tablet  indicates a stability problem  such as the characteristics odor of  acetic acid in aspirin tablet. Presence of odor could  be characteristic of the drug (Vitamin), added  ingredients (flavoring agent) or the dosage form  (film  coated tablet have a characteristic odor) For  chewable tablet presence or absence of specified taste can be checked. A  tablet level of flaws such as chip, cracks, contamination from  foreign solid  substances  (hair,  drops  of oil,  dirt), surface texture (smooth vs rough) and appearance (shining vs dull) may have zero defect.

4. Hardness and Friability: Tablet requires a certain amount of strength or hardness and resistance to friability to withstand mechanical shakes of handling in manufacture, packaging and shipping. Hardness generally measures the tablet crushing strength. The strength of a tablet was determined by following  ways;

(a) By cracking  the tablet between 2nd  and 3rd  fingers  with  the  thumb acting  as a fulcrum. If there is a sharp snap,  the tablet is an acceptable strength.

(b) Tablet hardness can be defined as the force required breaking a tablet in a diametric compression. In this test the tablet is placed between two anvils, force is applied to the anvils, and the crushing strength  that just  causes the tablet to break is recorded.

Generally used Hardness testers are:
(1) Monsanto  Tester
(2) Strong-Cobb  Tester
(3) Pfizer  Tester
(4) Erweka  Tester
(5) Schleuniger  Tester  

Hardness for compressed tablet is 5 to 8 kg.

Friability of  a tablet  can  determine in laboratory  by Roche friabilator. This consist of a plastic chamber that revolves at 25 rpm,  dropping the tablets through a Distance of six inches in the friabilator, which is then operate for 100 revolutions. The tablets are reweighed. Compress tablet that lose less  than 0.5 to 1.0 % of the Tablet weigh are consider acceptable.

5. Weight Variation test (U.S.P.): Take 20 tablet and  weighed individually. Calculate average weight and compare the individual tablet weight  to  the average. The tablet  pass the U.S.P. test if  no more that 2 tablets are outside the percentage limit and if no tablet differs by more than 2 times the percentage limit.

6. Content Uniformity Test: Randomly select 30 tablets. 10 of these assayed individually. The Tablet pass the test if  9 of the 10 tablets must contain not less than 85% and not more than 115% of the labeled drug content and the 10th  tablet may not contain less than 75% and more than 125% of the labeled content. If  these  conditions  are not met, remaining 20 tablet assayed individually and none may fall out side of the 85 to 115% range.

7. Disintegration Test (U.S.P.): The U.S.P. device to test disintegration uses 6 glass tubes that are 3” long;  open at the top and 10 mesh screen at the bottom  end. To test for disintegration time, one tablet is placed  in each tube and the basket rack is positioned in a 1-L beaker of  water, simulated  gastric fluid or simulated intestinal fluid  at 37 ± 20  C such that the tablet remain 2.5 cm  below the surface of liquid on their upward movement  and not closer than  2.5 cm  from  the bottom  of the beaker in their downward movement. Move the basket  containing the tablets up and down through a distance of 5-6 cm  at a frequency  of 28 to 32 cycles per minute. Floating of the tablets can be prevented by placing perforated plastic discs on each tablet. According to the test the tablet must disintegrate and all particles must pass through the 10 mesh screen in the time specified. If  any residue remains, it must have a soft mass.

Disintegration time:

Uncoated tablet: 5-30 minutes
Coated tablet: 1-2 hour

8. Dissolution Test (U.S.P.):

Apparatus-1:  A single tablet is placed in a small wire mesh basket attached to the bottom of the shaft connected to a variable  speed motor. The basket is immersed in a dissolution medium  (as  specified in monograph) contained in a 100 ml  flask. The flask is  cylindrical  with  a hemispherical bottom. The flask  is maintained  at 37±0.5^C by a constant temperature bath. The motor is  adjusted  to  turn at the specified speed and sample of the fluid are withdrawn at intervals to determine the amount of drug in solutions.

TABLET EXCIPIENTS

DILUENT:- Diluents  are  fillers used  to  make required bulk of  the  tablet  when the drug dosage itself is inadequate to produce the bulk. Secondary reason is to provide better tablet properties such as improve cohesion, to permit use of  direct compression manufacturing or to promote flow.

Commonly used tablet diluents:-

1. Lactose-anhydrous and spray dried lactose
2. Directly compressed starch-Sta Rx 1500
3. Hydrolyzed starch-Emdex  and Celutab 
4. Microcrystalline  cellulose-Avicel (PH 101and PH 102) 
5. Dibasic calcium  phosphate dehydrate
6. Calcium  sulphate dihydrate
7. Mannitol  
8. Sorbitol
9. Sucrose- Sugartab, DiPac, Nutab
10. Dextrose

BINDERS & AHESIVES:- These materials are added either dry or in wet- form  to form  granules or to form cohesive  compacts for directly compressed tablet.

Example:

Acacia, tragacanth- Solution for 10-25% Conc.      
Cellulose derivatives- Methyl  cellulose, Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose, Hydroxy propyl cellulose      
Gelatin- 10-20% solution      
Glucose- 50% solution        Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)- 2% conc.        Starch paste-10-20% solution. Sodium alginate, Sorbitol

DISINTEGRANTS:- Added to a tablet formulation  to facilitate its breaking or disintegration when it contact in water in the GIT.

Example:

Starch- 5-20% of tablet weight.                
Starch derivative – Primogel and Explotab (1-8%)                
Clays- Veegum  HV, bentonite 10% level in colored tablet only.         
Cellulose derivatives- Ac- Di-Sol (sodium  carboxy methyl cellulose)                
Alginate                
PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone), cross-linked

SUPERDISINTEGRANTS:- Swells up to ten fold within 30 seconds when contact water.

Example:

Crosscarmellose- cross-linked  cellulose, Crosspovidone- cross-linked povidone (polymer),
Sodium  starch glycolate- cross-linked starch. These cross-linked products swell upto 10n fold with in 30 seconds when in contact with water.

A portion of disintegrant  is added before granulation and a portion before compression, which serve as  glidants  or  lubricant. Evaluation of carbon dioxide in effervescent tablets is also one way of disintegration

LUBRICANTS AND GLIDANTS:-

Lubricants are intended to  prevent adhesion of the tablet materials to the surface of dies and punches, reduce  inter particle friction and may improve the rate of flow of the tablet granulation. Glidants are intended to promote flow of  granules or powder material by reducing the friction between the particles.

Example:

LUBRICANTS:- Stearic acid
Stearic acid salt - Stearic acid, Magnesium stearate, Talc, PEG (Polyethylene glycols), Surfactants

GLIDANTS:- Corn Starch – 5-10% conc., Talc-5% conc.
Silica derivative - Colloidal silicas such as Cab-O-Sil, Syloid, Aerosil in 0.25-3% conc.

COLORING AGENTS:- The use of colors and dyes in  a tablet has three purposes:    

(1) Masking of off color drugs  
(2) Product Identification    
(3) Production of more  elegant product

All coloring agents must  be approved and  certified by FDA. Two forms of colors are used in tablet preparation – FD &C and D & C dyes. These dyes are applied as solution in the granulating agent or Lake form  of these dyes. Lakes are dyes absorbed on hydrous oxide and employed as dry powder coloring.

Example:

FD & C yellow 6-sunset yellow
FD & C yellow 5- Tartrazine                
FD & C green 3-   Fast Green                
FD & C blue 1- Brilliant Blue                
FD & C blue 2 - Indigo carmine  
D & C red 3- Erythrosine 
D & C red 22 – Eosin Y

FLAVOURING AGENTS:- For chewable tablet- flavor oil are used

SWEETENING AGENTS:- For chewable tablets: Sugar, mannitol. 
Saccharine (artificial): 500  time’s sweeter than sucrose.

Thursday, 11 August 2016

TAPPED  DENSITY

TAPPED  DENSITY:- The  tapped  density  is  an  increased  bulk  density  attained  after  mechanically  tapping  a container  containing  the  powder  sample.   The  tapped  density  is  obtained  by  mechanically  tapping  a  graduated  measuring  cylinder  or vessel  containing  the  powder  sample.  After  observing  the  initial  powder  volume  or  mass,  the measuring  cylinder  or  vessel  is  mechanically  tapped,  and  volume  or  mass  readings  are  taken until  little  further  volume  or  mass  change  is  observed.  The  mechanical  tapping  is  achieved  by raising  the  cylinder  or  vessel  and  allowing  it  to  drop,  under  its  own  mass,  a  specified  distance by  either  of  three  methods  as  described  below.  Devices  that  rotate  the  cylinder  or  vessel during  tapping  may  be  preferred  to  minimize  any  possible  separation  of  the  mass  during tapping down.

Method  A :- The  apparatus  consists  of  the  following:

a 250 ml graduated  cylinder  (readable  to  2  ml)  with  a  mass  of 220  ±  44  g

a  settling  apparatus  capable  of  producing,  in  1  minute,  either  nominally  250  ±  15  taps from  a  height  of  3  ±  0.2  mm,  or  nominally  300  ±  15  taps  from  a  height  of  14  ±  2  mm.  The support  for  the  graduated  cylinder,  with  its  holder,  has  a  mass  of  450  ±  10  g.

Procedure

Proceed  as  described  above  for  the  determination  of  the  bulk  volume  (V0).  Secure the  cylinder  in  the  holder.  Carry  out  10,  500  and  1250  taps  on  the  same  powder  sample  and read  the  corresponding  volumes  V10,  V500  and  V1250  to  the  nearest  graduated  unit.  If  the difference  between  V500  and  V1250  is  less  than  or  equal  to  2  ml,  V1250  is  the  tapped  volume.  If the  difference  between  V500  and  V1250  exceeds  2  ml,  repeat  in  increments  such  as  1250  taps, until  the  difference  between  succeeding  measurements  is  less  than  or  equal  to  2  ml.  Fewer taps  may  be  appropriate  for  some  powders,  when  validated.  Calculate  the  tapped density  (g/ml)  using  the  formula  m/Vf  in  which  Vf  is  the  final  tapped  volume.  Generally, replicate  determinations  are  desirable  for  the  determination  of  this  property.  Specify  the  drop height  with  the  results. If  it  is  not  possible  to  use  a  100  g  test  sample,  use  a  reduced  amount  and  a  suitable  100  ml graduated  cylinder  (readable  to  1  ml)  weighing  130  ±  16  g  and  mounted  on  a  holder  weighing 240  ±  12  g.  The  modified  test  conditions  are  specified  in  the  expression  of  the  results.

Method  B

Procedure

Proceed  as  directed  under  Method  A  except  that  the  mechanical  tester  provides  a fixed  drop  of  3  ±  0.2  mm  at  a  nominal  rate  of  250  taps  per  minute.

Method  C

Procedure

Proceed  as  described  in  Method  C  for  measuring  the  bulk  density  using  the measuring  vessel  equipped  with  the  cap.  The  measuring  vessel  with  the  cap is  lifted  50-60  times  per  minute  by  the  use  of  a  suitable  tapped  density  tester.  Carry  out 200  taps,  remove  the  cap  and  carefully  scrape  excess  powder  from  the  top  of  the  measuring vessel  as  described  in  Method  C  for  measuring  the  bulk  density.  Repeat  the  procedure  using 400  taps.  If  the  difference  between  the  two  masses  obtained  after  200  and  400  taps  exceeds 2%,  carry  out  a  test  using  200  additional  taps  until  the  difference  between  succeeding measurements  is  less  than  2%.  Calculate  the  tapped  density  (g/ml)  using  the  formula  Mf/100 where  Mf  is  the  mass  of  powder  in  the  measuring  vessel.  Record  the  average  of three  determinations  using  three  different  powder  samples.  The  test  conditions  including tapping height are specified in the expression of the results.

MEASURES OF POWDER COMPRESSIBILITY

Because  the  interparticulate  interactions  influencing  the  bulking  properties  of  a  powder  are also  the  interactions  that  interfere  with  powder  flow,  a  comparison  of  the  bulk  and  tapped densities  can  give  a  measure  of  the  relative  importance  of  these  interactions  in  a  given powder.  Such  a  comparison  is  often  used  as  an  index  of  the  ability  of  the  powder  to  flow,  for example  the  Compressibility  index  or  the  Hausner  ratio. The  Compressibility  index  and  Hausner  ratio  are  measures  of  the  propensity  of  a  powder  to  be compressed  as  described  above.  As  such,  they  are  measures  of  the  powder  ability  to  settle  and they  permit  an  assessment  of  the  relative  importance  of  interparticulate  interactions.  In  a  freeflowing  powder,  such  interactions  are  less  significant,  and  the  bulk  and  tapped  densities  will be  closer  in  value.  For  poorer  flowing  materials,  there  are  frequently  greater  interparticulate interactions,  and  a  greater  difference  between  the  bulk  and  tapped  densities  will  be  observed. These  differences  are  reflected  in  the  Compressibility  Index  and  the  Hausner  Ratio.

Compressibility  index:- 100(Vo-Vf)/Vo

where

Vo - unsettled  apparent  volume,
Vf - final  tapped  volume.

Hausner Ratio: Vo/Vf

Depending  on  the  material,  the  compressibility  index  can  be  determined  using  V10  instead  of V0. If V10 is used, it is clearly stated in the results.

BULK DENSITY

BULK DENSITY:- The  bulk  density  of  a  powder  is  the  ratio  of  the  mass  of  an  untapped  powder  sample  and  its volume  including  the  contribution  of  the  interparticulate  void  volume.  Hence,  the  bulk  density depends  on  both  the  density  of  powder  particles  and  the  spatial  arrangement  of  particles  in  the powder  bed.  The  bulk  density  is  expressed  in  grams  per  millilitre  (g/ml)  although  the international  unit  is  kilogram  per  cubic  metre  (1  g/ml  =  1000  kg/m3)  because  the measurements  are  made  using  cylinders. It  may  also  be  expressed  in  grams  per  cubic  centimetre  (g/cm3). The  bulking  properties  of  a  powder  are  dependent  upon  the  preparation,  treatment  and  storage of  the  sample,  i.e.  how  it  was  handled.  The  particles  can  be  packed  to  have  a  range  of  bulk densities  and,  moreover,  the  slightest  disturbance  of  the  powder  bed  may  result  in  a  changed bulk  density.  Thus,  the  bulk  density  of  a  powder  is  often  very  difficult  to  measure  with  good reproducibility  and,  in  reporting  the  results,  it  is  essential  to  specify  how  the  determination was made.

Method  A:- Measurement  in  a  graduated  cylinder

Procedure

Pass  a  quantity  of  powder  sufficient  to  complete  the  test  through  a  sieve  with apertures  greater  than  or  equal  to  1.0  mm,  if  necessary,  to  break  up  agglomerates  that  may have  formed  during  storage;  this  must  be  done  gently  to  avoid  changing  the  nature  of  the material.  Into  a  dry  graduated  cylinder  of  250  ml  (readable  to  2  ml),  gently  introduce,  without compacting,  approximately  100  g  of  the  test  sample  (m)  weighed  with  0.1%  accuracy. Carefully  level  the  powder  without  compacting,  if  necessary,  and  read  the  unsettled  apparent volume  (V0)  to  the  nearest  graduated  unit.  Calculate  the  bulk  density  in  (g/ml)  using  the formula  m/V0.  Generally,  replicate  determinations  are  desirable  for  the  determination  of  this property. If  the  powder  density  is  too  low  or  too  high,  such  that  the  test  sample  has  an  untapped apparent  volume  of  either  more  than  250  ml  or  less  than  150  ml,  it  is  not  possible  to  use  100  g of  powder  sample.  Therefore,  a  different  amount  of  powder  has  to  be  selected  as  test  sample, such  that  its  untapped  apparent  volume  is  150  ml  to  250  ml  (apparent  volume  greater  than  or equal  to  60%  of  the  total  volume  of  the  cylinder);  the  mass  of  the  test  sample  is  specified  in the  expression  of  results. For  test  samples  having  an  apparent  volume  between  50  ml  and  100  ml  a  100  ml  cylinder readable  to  1  ml  can  be  used;  the  volume  of  the  cylinder  is  specified  in  the  expression  of results.

Method  B:-  Measurement  in  a  volumeter Apparatus

The  apparatus consists  of  a  top  funnel  fitted  with  a  1.0  mm  sieve.  The funnel  is  mounted  over  a  baffle  box  containing  four  glass  baffle  plates  over  which  the  powder slides  and  bounces  as  it  passes.  At  the  bottom  of  the  baffle  box  is  a  funnel  that  collects  the powder  and  allows  it  to  pour  into  a  cup  mounted  directly  below  it.  The  cup  may  be  cylindrical (25.00  ±  0.05  ml  volume  with  an  inside  diameter  of  30.00  ± 2.00  mm)  or  cubical (16.39  ±  0.20  ml  volume  with  inside  dimensions  of  25.400  ±  0.076  mm).

Procedure

Allow  an  excess  of  powder  to  flow  through  the  apparatus  into  the  sample receiving  cup  until  it  overflows,  using  a  minimum  of  25  cm3  of  powder  with  the  cubical  cup and  35  cm3  of  powder  with  the  cylindrical  cup.  Carefully,  scrape  excess  powder  from  the  top of  the  cup  by  smoothly  moving  the  edge  of  the  blade  of  a  spatula  perpendicular  to  and  in contact  with  the  top  surface  of  the  cup,  taking  care  to  keep  the  spatula  perpendicular  to prevent  packing  or  removal  of  powder  from  the  cup.  Remove  any  material  from  the  side  of the  cup  and  determine  the  mass  (M)  of  the  powder  to  the  nearest  0.1%.  Calculate  the  bulk density  (g/ml)  using  the  formula  M/V0  in  which  V0  is  the  volume  of  the  cup  and  record  the average  of  three  determinations  using  three  different  powder  samples.

Method  C:- Measurement  in  a  vessel Apparatus

The  apparatus  consists  of  a  100  ml  cylindrical  vessel  of  stainless  steel.

Procedure

Pass  a  quantity  of  powder  sufficient  to  complete  the  test  through  a  1.0  mm  sieve, if  necessary,  to  break  up  agglomerates  that  may  have  formed  during  storage  and  allow  the obtained  sample  to  flow  freely  into  the  measuring  vessel  until  it  overflows.  Carefully  scrape the  excess  powder  from  the  top  of  the  vessel  as  described  for  Method  B.  Determine  the mass  (M0)  of  the  powder  to  the  nearest  0.1%  by  subtraction  of  the  previously  determined  mass of  the  empty  measuring  vessel.  Calculate  the  bulk  density  (g/ml)  using  the  formula  M0/100 and record the average of three determinations using three different powder samples.

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

DIFFERENT TYPES OF TABLETS

Repeat action tablet: Sugar coated or multiple compressed tablets are used for this purpose.The core tablet is usually coated with shellac or an enteric polymer so that it will not release its drug in stomach but intestine. 

Delayed action and enteric-coated tablet: This  dosage form is intended to release the drug after some  time delay or after the  tablet has passed one part of the GIT into another. All  enteric coated  tablets are type  of  delayed action  tablet  but all delayed action tablets are not enteric or not intended to produce enteric action. 

Sugar coated tablet: Primary role is  to produce an elegant, glossy, easy  to swallow, widely utilized in preparing multivitamin and multivitamin mineral combination. Sugar coating doubled the tablet weight. Now polymers are used with sugar solution.

Film coated tablet: One type of coated tablet in  which drug is  not required in coating. This is an attractive method within one or two hours. Polymers such as hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose, and colloidal dispersion of ethylcellulose are commonly used. A 30% dispersion of ethyl cellulose is known as aquacoat. Advantage of film  coated over  sugar coated  tablets  is  better mechanical strength and flexibility of the coating, little increase in tablet weight. 

Chewable tablet: These are intended to be chewed  in the mouth before swallowing. Used for large tablet of antacid, bitter or foul testing drugs are not  suitable for this type tablet.

Buccal and sublingual tablet:  These tablets are small, flat and are intended to be held between the cheek  and teeth or in cheek  pouch (buccal tablet) or  below the tongue (sublingual tablet). Drugs used by this  route are for quick  systematic action. The tablets are designed not to be disintegrate but slowly dissolve.

Troches and lozenges:  Used in  the oral cavity to exert local effect in mouth and throat. They are commonly used to treat sore  throat or to control coughing in common cold. They may contain local  anesthetics,  antiseptic,  antibacterial agents, demulcents,  astringent  and  antitussive. The tablets are dissolving slowly over a period of 30 minutes.

Dental cone: These tablets are designed to be placed in the empty socket remaining after tooth extraction. Main purpose is to prevent microbial growth in the socket or to reduce bleeding.

Implantation tablets: Designed for substances implantation to provide prolonged drug effect from  one month to a year, tablets are usually small, cylindrical not more than 8mm length. These methods require special surgical technique for implantation and discontinuation of therapy. Generally used for administration of growth hormone to food producing animal.

Vaginal tablets: These are designed to undergo slow  dissolution and drug release in vaginal cavity. Tablets are wide or pear shaped,  used to antibacterial, antiseptic and astringent to treat vaginal infection.

Effervescent tablets: Tablets are designed to produce  a   solution  rapidly with  the release of carbon dioxide. The tablets  are prepared by compressing the active ingredient with mixture of organic acid such as  citric acid or  tartaric acid and sodium bicarbonate.

Dispersing tablets:  Tablets are intended to be added to a given volume of water to produce a solution of a given drug concentration.

Hypodermic tablets:  These tablets are composed of one or more drugs with watersoluble ingredients. Drug is added to sterile water to prepare sterile solution, which is injectable.

Tablet triturates:  Usually are made from  moist materials  using a  triturate mold, which gives them the shape of cylinder. Such tablet must be completely and rapidly soluble.

Compressed tablets:  Standard  uncoated  tablets are manufactured by  compression. The general methods are by wet granulation,  dry granulation or direct compression, used for rapid disintegration and drug release. Both type of action – systemic effect and local effect.

Multiple compressed tablets:  For incompatible components these are:  

A) Layered tablet- either two  layered (for two components)  or three layered (for three components) tablet.

B) Compressed coated type- either tablet within a tablet or tablet  within a tablet within a tablet.

Tablet  in this category are usually prepared for two reasons

1.  To separate physically or chemically  incompatible  ingredients.

2. To produce repeat action or prolong action product.

Volume  and Density Determination  Methods Using Manual Laboratory Devices

PYCNOMETRY ( SPECIFIC GRAVITY BOTTLES):- A pycnometer is a vessel with a precisely known volume. Although  a pycnometer is used to determine density  ρ  or specific  gravity,  it measures  volume  V; a balance is used to determine mass  m.  Manual  pycnometers (glassware)  typically  are used to determine the density  or specific gravity  of liquids  by  filling the vessel, then weighing. Density  is  calculated by  ρ  =  m/V  and specific gravity  by  the same equation and dividing  both sides by  the density of water with reference to temperature. First the object containing  the void  is weighed empty. It  is then filled with a  liquid  of known density  and reweighed. The  weight difference  ∆m  is the weight of the liquid  and from  these data, volume  can be calculated by V =  ∆m/ρ. As  will be  explained,  this  process  is used to ‘calibrate’ sample cells used in  mercury porosimetry. Another pycnometer method is to place a quantity  of a dry,  pre-weighed solid sample  in the  pycnometer and fill the rest of the pycnometer with a liquid of known density (typically  water), the weight of  the  pycnometer filled only  with the liquid having  previously been  established. The density  of the sample can be  determined  from  the known density  of the water,  the  weight  of the pycnometer filled only with the liquid, the weight  of  the  pycnometer containing  both sample and  liquid,  and  the weight of the sample.  This is a common  method used in characterizing  soil samples.

HYDROSTATIC WEIGHING ( DISPLACEMENT METHOD):- By  this  method,  the volume  of a solid sample is determined  by  comparing  the weight of the sample in air to the weight  of  the  sample immersed in a liquid of known density. The volume  of the sample is equal to  the  difference in  the  two  weights divided by  the density  of the liquid.  Conversely, if the volume  of a solid object is accurately  known, the density  of the  liquid  can be  determined  by  the loss of weight of the immersed  object.This is the basis for the hydrometer method. If  the sample is porous, one must determine  if the pores are to be included  or  excluded  from the  volume.   If  they  are to be included or the sample will react with  the  displacement medium,  a  sealing  coating  can be applied. If  pore volume  is to be excluded, the liquid must displace the air and completely  fill the  pores. Various pretreatment methods are used including  evacuation and boiling. When  determining  volume  by  directly measuring  the displaced volume,  liquids,  fine particles  or gases can be used as the displacement medium. If  the  sample  material  is porous,  fine  particles will not penetrate into the smaller pores that water  can  enter.  Mercury, being  a non-wetting  liquid, also will not penetrate pores under ambient pressure  as  will wetting  liquids. Gases, Helium  in  particular, will penetrate readily  into very  fine pores.

HYDROMETERS:- A  hydrometer is  a  vertical  float that measures the density  or specific gravity  of  a liquid  or liquid/solid suspension (slurry). The hydrometer,  inscribed  with a graduated scale along  its length, sinks into the  liquid  until  it  has displaced  a volume  of liquid equal in weight to that of the float.  Specific  gravity  or  density  is read directly  from  the inscribed scale at the liquid  surface  after buoyancy  and gravitational forces equalize.

FLOAT-SINK OR SUSPENSION (BUOYANCY) METHOD:-This  method  requires  a liquid of known and adjustable  density  in which the sample is placed. The  density  of the liquid is adjusted until the sample  either  begins  to  sink  or float , or is suspended  at  neutral  density  in the liquid.The  density  of the object is then equated to that of the liquid. This method also is used  to separate materials by  their density.

DENSITY GRADIENT COLUMN:-  A density gradient  column  is a column  of liquid that varies in  density  with height.  A sample is placed in the liquid  and observed to determine at what vertical  level in the column  the sample is suspended.    The  density  of the liquid at that level  is  the density  of the sample, and that value is determined by  standards of known density.

TAP DENSITY AND VIBRATORY PACKING  DENSITY:- These are very  similar methods for  determining the bulk  density  of a collection of  particles under  specific  conditions  of packing.   In  the former case, packing  is achieved by  tapping  the container and in the latter by  vibrating  the container. The particles under test should  not break  up under test conditions.

BULK/ENVELOPE VOLUME BY COATING:- Coating the sample allows  determination of  bulk  volume or apparent volume  of solids while preventing absorption  or reaction with suspension liquids. Penetration of the coating  into the  open  pores  of the sample must be considered. Following  the referenced method  the  mass of the sample is obtained. The  sample  is  dipped into molten wax of known density. After withdrawal, any  air bubbles in the  wax  coating are pressed out, and the coated  sample  is weighed.  The difference in  weight  before  and after  coating  is  the weight of the wax, and dividing  this  number  by  the density  of the wax provides the volume  of  wax  composing  the coating.   The volume  of the coated sample  is determined by  hydrostatic weighing.    From  this volume, the volume  of wax (or other coating)  is subtracted, yielding  the bulk  (or  envelope) volume  of the sample.

VALIDATION OF TEST SURFACE TO EVALUATE CLEANING EFFICACY

SWAB SAMPLING PROCEDURE

1. Pipette out 5 ml of sampling solvent in transport container.

2. Remove a swab from its protective bag using a clean latex hand glove.

3. Avoid touching the swab head to prevent its contamination. 

4. Transfer the swab in transport container (test tube) containing 5 ml of sampling solvent and allow the swab to soak completely. 

5. Take out the swab from sampling solvent and squeeze the tip against inner surface of test tube to remove excess solvent in such a manner that excess solvent drips inside the test tube.

6. Hold the stem of swab without touching the head of the swab.

7. Using one side of moistened swab wipe the test surface of 5 sq. inch with 10 firm horizontal strokes using a clean template. 

8. At the end of each stroke, lift the swab carefully. 

9. Turn the swab over to its other side; wipe the test surface of 5 sq. inch with 10 firm vertical strokes using the template.

10. At the end of each stroke, lift the swab carefully.

11. Hold the stem of the swab without touching the head of the swab and let the swab drop into the transport container. Plug the transport container with stopper and send for analysis after adequately labeling the same.

PROCEDURE FOR MICROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION

1. Take a sterile swab to sampling point.

2. Mark the swab with (1) Sampling point & (2) Date on outer cover. 

3. Put on the clean latex hand gloves and disinfect the same with 70% IPA. 

4. Take out the sterile swab carefully from the outer cover dip the swab in sterile water and swab the complete selected area (10x10 cm). 

5. Replace the swab immediately inside the cover, close it and send for analysis. Sample should not be hold for a long period exceeding 24 hours

Fo CALCULATIONS

NUMERICAL Fo VALUE

The actual observation obtained during the heat penetration studies at different temperature sensing location are complies in the table and the observed temperature shall be subjected to fo calculation at that particular location the lethality factor calculation is done by using the formula

F0 = dt ∑10(T-121)/z

F0 = dt ∑(sum of lethality factor)

Where,

dt = time interval between successive temperature measurements.

T =observed temperature at that particular time (as actual temperature recoded).

Z  = change in the heat resistance of Geobacillus stearothermophilus

Spores as temperature is changed (10°C or mentioned in COA).

Fo VALUE FOR BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS

The biological F0 value for biological indicator strip exposed during the sterilization can be calculated as follows

               F0 = D121 (log A – log B)

 Where,

 D121 = D Value of the biological indicator at 121°C

 A =experimental biological indicator concentration or spore population.

 B =desired level of sterility (SAL - 10^6)

DESIRED SPORE LOG REDUCTION

Calculate the desired reduction in spore log population by using the formula

SLR Desired = log A – log SAL desired

Where,

A = experimental population of biological indicator

SAL desired = desired level level of sterility (10-6)

ACTUAL SPORE LOG REDUCTION

Calculate the actual reduction in spore population by using the formula

SLR actual  = Fo/D121

Where,

     Fo = Minimum calculated Fo value

     D121 = D value of Biological indicator

 HEATING BLOCK VALIDATION

PROCEDURE
   
1. Take 5 calibrated thermometer and give them No. L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 as mentioned in annexure.

2. Keep five thermometer in test tubes at different location inside well of heating block as per location chart enclosed.

3. Operate Heating block as per S.O.P.

4. Compare temperature of each thermometer with respect to temperature adjusted one on heating block  at every 15 minutes interval upto 1 hours.

5. Record the result as per annexure.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Temperature on display should be within 37°C + 1°C.

The results obtained at all location of heating block should be within 36 to 38°C.

Change the location by placing thermometer in other than previously selected location to cover maximum well during validation in a calendar year.

FREQUENCY

Every month

Sunday, 24 July 2016

HVAC SYSTEM VALIDATION TESTS

1. AIR FLOW PATTERN

• Take the titanium tetra chloride stick.

• Burn the stick.

• Place the burning stick in front of running Air Handling Unit (AHU).

• Observed the flow of air with the help of smock distribution in the room.

• Make chart diagram of flew of air in the room as annexure-I for each room.

2. AIR FLOW VELOCITY AND CHANGE PER HOUR

• Scan the area of  the HEPA Filter, with the  anemometer  probe, 6 inches from the filter face.

• For  ease of experiment, divide the area of the HEPA Filter into 4 equal, hypothetical grids.

• Record the velocity readings taken at the center of the grids, and at the junction of dividing lines (center of HEPA Filter)  in 5.5.

• Calculate the Average Velocity (V in feet per minute ) as :
                                               
          V  = (V1+V2+V3+V4)/4           
                                                                                 Vi  = Velocity observation at each point 

• Measure the dimensions of each air inlet i.e. HEPA Filter, in  feets and record it.

• Calculate the Area (A in square feet) of each Air inlet as product of the  length and the width as :

                  A  =  l x w                     

   where  l    =  length of inlet
               w  =  width of inlet

• Calculate the Total Air Volume ( T in cubic feet per minute ) supplied in each zone, by using the formula :

               T  = A x V                 

 where  A  =  Area of particular Air inlet in          square feet
             V  =  Average air velocity at particular air inlet in feet per minute

• Calculate the total volume of the room by multiplying length of room, breadth of room and height of the room.
                            = L x B  x  H

• Total air change is divided by total volume of the room will give the air change per hour. Fill the record in the form as annexure-II.

3. FILTER LEAK TEST

• Place the velometer at the front of AHU  unit.

• Check the velocity of air to the all corner of the AHU. The air velocity should be within the higher limit of HEPA filter.

• If there is air velocity is more than higher limit change the gas cut to prevent the air leakage.

4. PARTICLES COUNT

• On the air system before one hour of test operation. Take the suitable particle counter and operate it to check the particles in the room at non working operation.

• Collect the information from particle counter and fill them in the format.

• Operate the particle counter when work is on progress in the area. The particles should be count when more than one hour work has been progressed in the area. Record the data in the format.

• Operate the particle counter for all the room maintaining grade A, grade B, grade C & grade D.

5. VIABLE MONITORING

• Expose Plate Count Agar  and  Saboraud  Dextrose  Agar media plates  in  sterile  manufacturing area (Fabrication , Vial Filling ,  Vial  Sealing & Sterile  passage) as  per  location plan given on  the back of paper sheet. Similarly expose the plates in Change Room and Degowning twice in a week and once in a week in Vial Washing , Bung Washing and Component Preparation.

• Monitor the microbial load  on the  surface  of  the  sterile  manufacturing  area  by  swab sampling  and testing. Carry out  swab  sampling  daily in Vial  Filling, Vial Sealing,  Sterile Buffer and Blending III; and twice in a week in Sterile Passage, Change Room and Degowning. Similarly  carry out the swab sampling once  in a week in Change Room, Degowning, Vial Washing ,Bung Washing and component Preparation. Record the results.

• Place the media strips or petridics in the air sampler on operate the air sampler as per standard operating procedure of the equipment.

• Record the data in the format.

• Monitor  the  microbial  load  on  surface  of  hand  gloves  of  the  operators  daily  once  in  each working  shift  at  random  during  activity and  record  the  result. Record the data in the format.

• In  case  of  repeated  failure  during  two  observations the  corrective  action  shall  immediately be  planned  and  implemented.

• Monitor  the  critical  functions  of  HVAC system , Water System.  and  personnel's  behavior  in sterile  and  investigate  cause  of   adverse  results  immediately after  observation.

6. FILTER INTEGRITY TEST (DOP TEST)

• Generate DOP Aerosol using Aerosol generator, by subjecting DOP to 20 psi air pressure. Direct   test   aerosol at  the supply duct in the Air Handling System.                                                                                                                           • Switch  the  photometer   "ON"   and  allow  to  stabilise for  five min.                                                                                • Ensure that 100 % upstream concentration is achieved at all the  terminal HEPA filters.

• Scan the filter matrix and perimeter by passing the receptor probe 1 inch from the filter surface , in overlapping strokes traversing  at  approximately  10 fpm to check for  leaks, if any.
           
• Test all the HEPA filters as per the above steps and record the observations in the format.      

7. PRESSURE DIFFERENCE

• Attached all concerning room (Under Test) to the manometer which are attached the wall of adjacent area.

• On the air system in side tested area and wait to stablise the pressure in the area.

• Observed the pressure difference from all room and from room to room.

• Record the data in the format.
           
8. RECOVERY ( TEMP. & HUMIDITY)

• Off the HVAC system and checked the humidity of the area.

• If humidity of the area within in specification. Increase the humidity by spraying hot water in the are up to 75%.

• Wait to stablise the humidity in the area about 75%.

• Operate the HVAC system and note the time. Wait to stablise the humidity in the area within the specification limit.

• Note and record the time in the format.

• For the recovery test increase the temperature of the area by using hot air  blower in the area and increase the temperature 40 ºC.

• Operate the HVAC system and note the time.  Wait to stablise the temperature  in the area within the specification limit.

• Note and record the time in the format.

9. TEMP. & HUMIDITY UNIFORMITY TEST

• Place the calibrated thermometer on the different location.

• Operate the HVAC system and note the time. Wait to stablise the temperature  in the area within the specification limit.

• Check and record the temperature of the area in format.

• Place the calibrated hygrometer  on the different location.

• Operate the HVAC system and note the time.  Wait to stablise the humidity  in the area within the specification limit.

• Check and record the temperature of the area in format.

10. FRESH AIR DETERMINATION

• On the concerned AHU and wait to stabiles the air pressure in room.

• On the fresh air dumper for fresh air and observed and calculate the intake air by the dumper in the room. Observed and calculate the total air change in the room.

• The intake fresh air is divided by the total air change in the room and multiply by 100 to calculate the % fresh air intake on each cycle by the HVAC system in the tested room.

• Record the data in the performance format record.

Wednesday, 20 July 2016

AUTOCLAVE VALIDATION IN PHARMACEUTICALS

Validation of an Autoclave for pharmaceutical use will be considered qualified for consistent and reliable performance (validated) on successful completion of the following –

• Bowie – Dick Test for steam penetration (3 trails).

• Empty Chamber Heat distribution studies (3 trails) with temperature mapping probe at different locations of the sterilizer chamber.

• Loaded chamber heat Distribution & penetration studies (3 trails) for each sterilization load of fixed loading pattern:-
1) Sterile area garments (20 number Garments packs, Each pack contains 01 Nos. Boiler suit, 01 Nos. Headgear, 02 Nos booties, 01 pairs gloves)

2) Glassware (S.S Mannifold holder (06 holder) 02 Nos, Sampling unit of Compressed air 02 Nos, 500 ml sampling bottles 10 Nos, 250 ml sampling bottles 25 Nos, 04 Nos S.S Bin.)

3) Media (SCDA Medium – 500 ml 09 Nos. Conical flask, SCDM – 100 ml 20 Nos. tubes, FTM – 100 ml 10 Nos. tubes, MSA – 250 ml 01 Nos Conical flask, CA – 250 ml 01 Nos Conical flask, BGA – 250 ml 01 Nos Conical flask, BSA – 250 ml 01 Nos Conical flask, MCA – 250 ml 01 Nos Conical flask, Peptone Water – 500 ml 06 Nos. Conical flask.)

With temperature mapping probes along with Biological Indicator (Geobacillus stearothermophillus spore vials containing 10^6 or more spores per vials) inside the innermost possible layer of the load subjected for sterilization.

• Estimation of the F0 Value achieved during the sterilization hold period at each temperature mapping probe.
To qualify these tests the equipment should fulfill the acceptance criteria described in the individual test procedures. After completion of the qualification tests all the data generated will be compiled together to evaluate ability of the steam sterilizer to sterilize different components at the set parameters and set loading pattern.

A). BOWIE-DICK TEST FOR STEAM PENETRATION

Objective of this test is to ensure that the vacuum pulses applied the sterilization Hold period are sufficient to remove the entrapped air so as to facilitate rapid and even steam penetration into all parts of the load and maintaining these conditions for the specified temperature holding time (17 minutes at 121 deg.C)
If air is present in the chamber, it will collect within the Bowie – Dick test pack as a bubble. The indicator in the region of the bubble will be of different color as compared to the color on the remaining part of the test paper, because of a lower temperature, lower moisture level or both. In this condition the cycle parameters to be reviewed and the normal sterilization cycles to be modified accordingly.
Bowie – Dick cycle should be normally preceded by a warm – up cycle, as the effectiveness of air removal may depend on all parts of the sterilizer being at working temperature.

PROCEDURE

1. Record the set parameters for the Bowie – Dick test cycle in the annexure.

2. Place one Bowie – Dick test pack near the drain of the sterilization chamber.

3. Select cycle Bowie – Dick on the control panel & operate the steam sterilizer.

4. The print out taken during the Bowie – Dick test cycle & the Bowie – Dick test indicator should be preserved.

5. Compile the observation made during the qualification test for complete evaluation of the system.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

The Bowie – Dick Test indicator should show a uniform color change, non – uniform change and/or air entrapment (bubble) spot on the pattern indicates inadequate air removal from the sterilization chamber.

B). EMPTY CHAMBER HEAT DISTRIBUTION STUDIES

Objective of this test is to ensure that, the sterilizer is capable of attaining a temperature of 121 deg.C during the sterilization hold period with steam pressure of 1.1 to 1.2 kg/cm2.
Temperature spread with in the range of 121 deg.C to 124 deg.C during sterilization cycle will demonstrate the uniform heat distribution within the chamber.
Any location where the temperature indicator is placed, not achieving minimum sterilization temperature of 121deg.C through out the sterilization temperature hold will be considered as cold spot.

PROCEDURE

1. Record the set parameter for the sterilization cycle to be operated during the test for empty chamber heat distribution study, in the Annexure.

2. Pass minimum 16 no. Temoerature mapping probe into chamber through the port of the sterilizer. Seal the port with silicone sealant so that steam leakage does not take place. Suspend the probes in the chamber in different position so that probes do not touch any metallic. Record the position of the probes in a respective schematic form.

3. Connect the probes to a suitable data logger, which can scan and print the actual temperature observed at different locations with respect to time.

4. Operate the steam sterilizer and also start the data logger to record actual temperature within the sterilization chamber with respect to time.

5. When the sterilization cycle completes, 1) Collect printout of the sterilizer and preserve as Annexure. 2) Download the data-analysis and printing. Record the temperatures observed at different locations in the Annexure.

6. If the empty chamber heat distribution study is acceptable perform three consecutive runs to demonstrate cycle and sterilizer reproducibility.

7. Compile the data generated during the qualification test for complete evaluation of the system.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

There should be uniform distribution of heat in the sterilizer chamber during the sterilization hold period and the temperature at each temperature mapping probes should be within the range of 121 deg.C to 124 deg.C during the sterilization hold period.

C). LOADED CHAMBER HEAT DISTRIBUTION AND PENETRATION STUDIES

Objective of this test is to ensure that, the steam is sufficiently penetrating into the innermost portions of the load subjected for sterilization to achieve desired temperature of 121 deg.C during the complete sterilization hold period with steam pressure of 1.1 to 1.2 kg.cm2.
If Sterilization temperature (121 deg.C) is not achieved through out the cycle, load configuration or size of the load has to be reviewed and cycle to be repeated.
Temperature spread within the range of 121 deg.C to 124 deg.C during sterilization hold period indicate that, uniform heating process which is achieved in the empty chamber heat distribution study is not affected by load. There could be the possibility of lag period for attaining 121 deg.C during heat penetration runs as the probes are placed deep into the load.
Any location where the temperature indicator is placed, not achieving minimum sterilization temperature of 121deg.C during sterilization temperature hold period will be considered as cold spot.

PROCEDURE

1. Record the set parameter for the sterilization cycle to be operated during the test for loaded chamber heat penetration study in the Annexure.

2. Pass minimum 16 no. Temperature mapping probe into chamber through the port provided. Seal the port with silicone sealant so that steam leakage does not take place. Place the probes inside the load components, which are supported to be most difficult points for steam penetration, also place biological indicator along with temperature mapping probe (12 Nos.). Record the position of the probes and biological indicators in a representative schematic form.

3. Connect the probes to a suitable data logger, which can scan and print the actual temperature with respect to time.

4. Operate the steam Sterilizer and also start the data logger to record the actual temperatures within the sterilization chamber with respect to time.

5. When the sterilization cycle completes, 1) Collect printout of the sterilizer and preserve as Annexure. 2) Download the data-analysis and printing. Record the temperatures observed at different locations in the Annexure. 3) Aseptically collect the exposed biological indicators and send the indicators to microbiology lab for further incubation and observed the results.

6. If the load penetration study is acceptable perform three consecutive runs to demonstrate cycle and sterilizer reproducibility.

7. Compile the data generated during the qualification test for complete evaluation of the system.

ACCEPTENCE CRITERIA

There should be uniform distribution & penetration of heat in the load subjected for sterilization during the sterilization hold period and the temperature at each temperature mapping probe should be within the range of 121 deg.C to 124 deg.C during the complete sterilization hold period.

D) BIO CHALLENGE STUDIES

OBJECTIVE

The steam sterilization process, when challenged with Geobacillus stearothermophillus Biological indicator spore vial, spore population of NLT 10^6 spores/vial, should reduce bacterial load by mean of Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) 10^6
On incubation of the loaded biological indicator, if growth is observed, then the sterilization cycle parameters to be reviewed.

PROCEDURE

1. Determine the initial counts of  biological indicator.

2. Collect the exposed indicator (during the loaded chamber heat distribution & heat penetration studies) by using sterile forceps and scissors in a 100 ml beaker and then send to microbiology lab for incubation (Incubate the vial at 55 to 60 deg.C for 48 hours)

3. Keep one vial as a negative control provided by the Mfg of biological indicator as well as one vial as a positive control (unexposed vial biological indicator).

4. Observe any growth (purple color – sterile, yellow color – Non sterile) in the vial daily. Record the observations on daily basic in the Annexture.

5. Compile the data generated during the qualification test for complete evaluation of the system.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

No bacterial growth should observed during the incubation period of 48 hours at 55 to 60 deg.C.

E) ESTIMATION OF F0 VALUE

OBJECTIVE

The calculated F0 value should not be less than the biological F0 value at all temperature mapping locations during the sterilization hold period.

PROCEDURE

1. Record the temperature at all temperature mapping probes during the sterilization hold period in the Annexure.

2. Calculate the F0 value at each temperature mapping probe by using the equation as below.

3. Record the F0 value (Results) in the Annexure.

4. Compile the data generated during the qualification test for complete evaluation of the system.

CALCULATION

F0 = dt S10(T-121)/z

Where
dt = Time interval between two following temperature measurements (1 minutes).

T = The observed Temperature at that particular time.

Z = The change in the heat resistance of Geobacillus stearothermophillus spores as temperature is changed (10 deg.C).

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

The calculated minimum F0 value (by equation) should be more than biological F0 value for the biological indicator vial exposed for the bio-challenge studies.

The biological F0 value for the specific biological indicator spore vial is calculated as per the following equation

F0 = D121 (Log A – Log B)

Where

D121 = D value of the of the biological indicator at 121 deg.C.

A = Biological indicator concentration or spore population.

B = Desired level of non – sterility. (10 deg.c.).

VALIDATION OF SHELF LIFE FOR 70% V/V IPA

VALIDATION TEST

Validation of diluted disinfectant storage conditions are done by following methods

      ·  Surface swab test Method
      ·  Settle Plate Method

1. Prepare 70% v/v solution of Isopropyl Alcohol.

2. Carry out the sterility of diluted IPA solution by Membrane filtration method.

3. Store the disinfectant solution at room temperature, and analyze the sample on the day of preparation, after 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs and 96 hours by Surface swab Test, Settle Plate Method.

SURFACE SWAB METHOD

Remove following culture slant from the refrigerator and allow it to attain room temperature:-

      ·  Staphylococcus aureus
      ·  Escherichia coli
      ·  Pseudomonas aeruginosa
      ·  Salmonella, and
      ·  Wild culture

1. Inoculate loop full of the culture from each slant separately into 50 ml of sterile Soyabean casein digest medium and incubate at 32.5 ± 2.5°C for 24 – 48 hrs.

2. Transfer 1.0 ml of the broth culture into 9.0 ml of sterile saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride solution) to obtain a test dilution of 10-1.

3. Transfer 1.0 ml of the 10-1 dilution into 9.0 ml of sterile saline solution to give 10-2 dilution.

4. Similarly serially dilute the culture suspension to obtain dilution of 10-3, 10-4, 10-5  and 10-6.

5. Plate 1.0 ml of the culture suspension from dilution 10-3, 10-4, 10-5 and 10-6 in duplicate into sterile petri dishes.

6. Pour approximately 15-20 ml of sterile Soyabean Casein Digest Agar cooled to about 45°C in each plate. Incubate at 32.5 ± 2.5°C for 24 to 48 hours.

7. Count the number of colonies on each plate and Select the dilution, which gives a count of not less than 10-5.

8. Apply 1.0 ml of each culture suspension containing cell concentration not less than 10-5 cfu/ml, separately on the floor approx 25 cm2 area, and allow to air dry.

9. After drying, take a surface swab as per latest SOP for Swab Testing, and carry out the determination of total aerobic count per cm2 withing 4 hours of sampling.

10. Immediately clean the floor with IPA 70% v/v solution and allow to stand for 30 minutes to facilitate the action of disinfectant solution on the challenge test organisms.

11. After 30 minutes, take a swab and detect the bacterial count as per SOP for swab testing.

12. Repeat the same procedure, step no. 9 to 12 to determine the efficacy of 70% IPA solution after 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs and 96 hours at room temperature.

SETTLE PLATE METHOD

1. Expose the pre-incubated sterile Soybean casein digest agar plate for 2 hours.

2. After plate exposure time, immediately clean the floor with IPA 70% v/v solution.

3. After proper cleaning, spray the area with IPA 70 % v/v solution and immediately close the room 30 minutes to facilitate the action of disinfectant solution.

4. After 30 minutes of contact time, immediately expose the plate as per latest SOP for plate exposure and detect the bacterial count per location per 2 hours.

5. Repeat the same procedure, step no. 1 to 4 to determine the efficacy of IPA 70% v/v solution after 24 hrs, 48 hrs, 72 hrs and 96 hours at room temperature

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Diluted disinfectant solution, which is stored at room temperature, is effective when the test result of surface swab and Settle plate shows 90% reduction of the challenged microorganisms.

*  10-3 or 10-1 means 10 to power -1

HOLD TIME STUDY PROTOCOL FOR STERILISED GARMENTS FOR THEIR STERILITY

PROCEDURE

1. Prepare a Dacron bag contains 1 pair of garments used in  sterility testing area, and place 10 cut pieces (6x5 cm) of old dress in-between the dress.

2. Perform the sterilization of the bag as per the SOP for sterilization of dresses.

3. After sterilization place the Dacron bag in Garment cubicle for Hold time study.

4. Collect one cut piece from the dress bag aseptically and direct immerse into the sterilized Soyabean Casein Digest medium and check for the sterility, this sample shall be treated as initial sample. (0 Hour)

5. Similarly collect the dress pieces from the hold bag at regular intervals of 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr, 96 hr, and 120 hr and perform the sterility test.

6. Incubate the samples at the specified temperature for 14 days (20-25°C for 7 days and 30-35°C for 7 days).
Note: 0 Hrs starts when the sterilized garments placed in Garment cubicle after sterilization.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

This study is carried out to establish the hold time of sterilized garments after sterilization.
Microbial determination : No growth should be observed in sterility test.

CONCLUSION

After complete evaluation of the hold time study for sterilized garments used for sterility testing a final hold time study summary report shall be prepared which should essentially contain discussion and conclusion which clearly determine the hold time period for sterilized garments.

VALIDATION PROTOCOL FOR HOLD TIME STUDY OF SWAB TEST SAMPLES

PROCEDURE

1.  Prepare 0.9% saline solution and dispense 10 ml quantity in test tube and put one sterile cotton swab in it and sterilize in autoclave at 15 lbs pressure and 121°C for 15 minutes or use pre sterilized swab tubes and fill with 10 ml sterile 0.9% saline solution.

2. Swab 5x5 cm2 area using parallel  overlapping stroke with slow rotation of swab.

3. Repeat the sampling with crossing first stroke at 90 degree angle. After taking the swab put the swab stick back into 0.9% saline solution tube.

4. After taking swab write the location and date of swab with marker on tube.

5. Bring the tubes to quality control laboratory and gently vortex for 1 minute. Perform the bio-burden testing using 1 ml of solution by membrane filtration.

6. Mark and incubate the plates at 22.5 ± 2.5 °C for 3 days followed by 32.5 ± 2.5 °C for 2 days inverted position.

7. Store the tubes containing the remaining solution with swab stick at 2-8 °C.

8. After 24 hours take the swab tubes and gently vortex for 1 minute.

9. Perform the bio-burden testing again using 1 ml solution from the tubes.

10. Mark and incubate the plates at 22.5 ± 2.5 °C for 3 days followed by 32.5 ± 2.5 °C for 2 days inverted position.

11. After incubation count and observe the plates of both studies for number of colonies on colony counter or under light source with the help of marker.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

There shall be no increase in bio-burden on holding at 2-8°C for 24 hrs.

CONCLUSION

After complete evaluation of the hold time study for swab a final hold time study summary report shall be prepared which should essentially contain discussion and conclusion which clearly determine the hold time period for swab test samples.

VALIDATION OF PURE STEAM

Pure steam is used in various operations in pharmaceuticals but its use in sterilization is very common in pharmaceutical sterile manufacturing.
Pure steam system should be qualified. A WHO guide to good manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements clearly says to perform the performance qualification of pure steam. At the time of performance qualification of pure steam generation system, sample shall be taken from each steam user point and analyzed for three consecutive days. Purified water system must be qualified before starting the qualification of pure steam.

SAMPLING OF PURE STEAM

Sampling for Bacterial Endotoxin Test and chemical tests should be done separately. Depyrogenated tubes or bottles should be used for taking sample for bacterial endotoxin test. Allow the steam to drain for minimum one minute. Open the cap of bottle and fill the bottle with steam condensate by holding the bottle in the holder. Gloves should wear into the hands while sampling the pure steam. Tighten the cap of the bottle and mark with the sampling information. It sample is not analyzed within 2 hours of sampling, store the sample at 2-8 °C.

ANALYSIS OF PURE STEAM

Pure steam should be analyzed for following tests:-

1. Non-Condensable gases:- Non condensable gases are air and carbon dioxide those do not condense with the steam. These are generated due to their presence in the purified water that continuously circulates in the water distribution system. Non condensable gases should not be more than 3.5%.

2. Steam Dryness value:- Dry steam has more energy than the wet steam. Wet steam has water with it and does not have heat energy as dry steam. Dryness of steam is determined by the latent heat. Dryness of the pure steam should not be less than 90%. High moisture content can cause the loss in energy of steam and that may cause the longer sterilization time.

3.  pH:- Steam condensate is analyzed for pH value at 25 °C . It should be between 5-7.

4. Conductivity:- Conductivity should be tested with calibrated conductivity meter at 20 °C. Conductivity should not be more than 1.3 µS/cm.

5. Microorgansims:- Steam condensate is tested for microbial contamination using pore plate method. There should not any microbial contamination in steam condensate.

6. Endotoxin Test:- Determine the endotoxin in the pure steam condensate and it should not be more than 0.25 EU/ml as in water for injection.

Tuesday, 19 July 2016

LEAK TEST FOR AMPOULES

Ampoules are small glass containers that contain a sterile medicinal liquid intended for parentral use. Presence of capillary pores or tiny cracks can cause microbes or other dangerous contaminants to enter the ampoules or may lead to the leakage of contents to outside. This may lead to contamination of the sterile contents and also spoilage of appearance of the package.
Changes in temperature during storage can cause expansion and contraction of the ampoule and its contents, thereby accentuating interchange if an opening exists. Leaker test for ampoules is intended to detect incompletely sealed ampoules so that they can be discarded in order to maintain the sterile conditions of the medicines.Tip seals are more likely to be incompletely closed than pull seals.Open capillaries or cracks at the point of seal result in LEAKERS.

TEST PROCEDURE:

Leakers are detected by this process in a visible manner. Ampoules are placed in a vacuum chamber, completely submerged in a deeply colored dye solution of about 0.5 to 1% methylene blue.
A negative pressure is applied within the ampoule. Subsequent atmospheric pressure causes the dye to penetrate an opening thus making it visible after the ampoule has been washed.
The vacuum, about 27 inches Hg, should be sharply released after 30 minutes. Detection of leakers is prominent when ampoules are immersed in a bath of dye during autoclaving cycle as this has the advantage of accomplishing both leaker detection and sterilization in one operation.

DISADVANTAGES:

Capillaries of 15 micron or smaller diameter cannot be detected by this test.
Vials and bottles are not subjected to such a leaker test as the rubber closer is not rigid.

LEAKAGE TEST FOR INJECTABLE AND NON INJECTABLE PLASTIC CONTAINERS

Fill about 10 containers with water and fit with an appropriate closure.
Keep these containers in an inverted position at room temperature for about 24 hrs. Check for any leakage from any container.

WATER VAPOUR PERMEABILITY TEST

Take five containers and fill them with nominal volume of water. Heats seal these containers with an aluminium foil - polyehtylene laminate or other seal. Weigh the containers accurately and allow to stand for 14 days at a relative humidity of 55 - 65% and a temperature between 20 to 25@C. Reweigh the containers. The loss in weight in each container should not be more than 0.2%.

VARIOUS METHODS FOR LEAKAGE DETECTION

Above mentioned test are specific for certain types of material. Some other approaches also available to detect the leak in various types of container based upon different mechanisms. Let's see one by one:-

(1) OBSERVATION OF VISUAL DEFECTS (pinholes, capillaries):

This is done by leak test using methylene blue dye what I mentioned for ampoules.

(2) WEIGHT CHANGE:

This calculated by plotting a graph with loss or gain versus time under specifically defined condition (what I mentioned in water vapour permeability test).

(3) PRESSURE VACUUM CHANGES:

By the application of pressure and/or vacuum under defined conditions can help detect any leaks to external atmospheres like gases in the form of bubbles. Detection by visual inspection are limited to around 1 cm3 per minute with the possible detection of pinholes up to 20-25m.
Pressure decay systems are operated to a specified pressure and then monitored for pressure drop by which leaks down to 10-3 cm3/sec.
Pressure increase method can also be used in which leakage from a pack under vacuum is detected as a positive pressure change.
Flexible packs generally intend to extend (or indent) when the pack is under vacuum or pressure in sealed condition. A grossly leaking pack does not show any such movement and a slightly leaking one shows less movement. By assessing these movements the leak can be analyzed with the help of transducers or spring loaded sensors.
The sense of deflection and force changes can be detected with typical instruments like blister testers.
Both these methods are more sensitive than the older conventional vacuum with dye tests and can detect pinholes down to 10m. These tests are also non destructive and the time period is as small as 0.5 to unit second in order to minimize temperature effects.

(4) GASEOUS DETECTION TESTS:

This test makes use of gases associated with the product or a gas which is specifically introduced for the leakage detection process. The commonly used gases are:
Helium uses mass spectrometry which enables leakage to be detected down to 10-12 Pa m3s. This test needs high vacuum that may not be ideal for the component being tested. Other halogens are also used for gas detection.
Oxygen, i.e. Mocon Ox-tran: It uses a stream of dry nitrogen whereby presence of oxygen is detected coulometrically.
Carbon dioxide, e.g. Mocon Permatran C used to detect carbon dioxide in another dry gas using infrared technique.
Moisture vapour, e.g. Mocon Permatran W or Dynamic water vapour tester measures moisture by a photoelectric sensor.
Radio isotope tracer gas, e.g. using krypton 85 where a high sensitivity is reported.

(5) BURST TESTS:

The strength of the seals can be estimated by tensile tests as seal or peel tests or the air pressure that is sufficient to create rupture.
This test is carried out by placing a hypodermic needles arrangement and pressurizing the pack against it at a specific rate until the pack bursts. Depending on the nature of the seal the rupture may arise in the body of the pack or at the seal.
An alternative to this can be done by applying steadily increasing mechanical compression on a pack placed in a jig.

(6) MICROBIAL INTEGRITY:

Different methods have been developed under normal pressure and vacuum in order to check whether highly contaminated liquid, gel or media based material will grow back or penetrate closure systems. Alternative methods of leak detection are more preferable as variable results been observed with this method.

(7) CRACK, PINHOLE, CAPILLARY DETECTION:

The old conventional dye/vacuum immersion tests were used earlier to check the seal efficiency in ampoules. These methods have been replaced by electrical conductivity and capacitance type tests.
Typical equipments include NIKKA DENSOK AMPOULE INSPECTION MACHINE.
This machine employs a high frequency and high voltage. It distinguishes between good glass (a non conductor) and areas of cracks or pinholes where current will flow between the inner and outer glass surfaces.
There are other machines that make use of capacitance and dielectric constants where a material with defects will display a higher dielectric constant.

(8) THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY:

These make use of a thermistor bridge that is balanced against air and is subsequently upset if another gas leaks into the leak.

(9) CHEMICAL TRACER TESTS:

This test follows the principle of interaction between material i.e. ammonia on one side and hydrochloric acid on the other forms a white cloud of ammonium chloride indicating leakage. Pinhole can be well detected by this method.

(10) THERMOCOUPLE GAUGES:

This technique based on the mechanism of temperature change. These are mainly used to detect a drop in temperature when a solvent type systems escape under vacuum. It is also used to detect the presence of warmer gases.

TABLET COATING PROBLEMS

BLISTERING:- It is the  detachment of film from the tablet substrate as the elasticity of surface film compromised.


Cause- generally occur due to higher temperature during various stages of coating.


CHIPPING: It is generally a edge phenomena in which at the edge of tablet the surface film chipped off.


Cause decrese in rotation speed of pan, poor coating solution.


CRATERING: It is defect in which a defect in film coating leads to craters appearing exposing the tablet surface.


Cause insufficient drying time, high volume of coating solution used

PICKING: It is defect where a surface film is pulled away from the surface when the tablet sticks together and then part due to being detached away from the core. 


Cause over wetting of tablets due to polymer solution, improper drying.


PITTING: It is a defect in which deformation occur or pitts formation occur in the surface of a tablet core without any visible disruption of the film coating.


Cause it generally occur when the temp of core of the tablets generally higher than the melting points of material used in it. 


BLOOMING: It is defect where dullness in coating colour of tablet occur after  prolonged storage at high temperatures.


Causes use of low molecular weight plasticizer, 


BLUSHING: It is defect in which whitish specks or haziness occur  in the film.


Cause occur due to the high caoting temp. Leads to percipitation of polymers on surface. 


COLOUR VARIATION: A defect which involves variation in colour of the film.
Cause poor mixing, uneven spray pattern, migration of dyes during drying etc.


Infilling- it refers to filling of intagliations(distinctive words or symbols on tablet surface)


Cause due to accumulation or settling of foam in intagliations caused due to air spraying 


ORANGE PEEL EFFECT: It is surface defect resulting in appearence of an orange peel having rough and nonglossy texture.


Cause too high spray pressure, poor tablet composition, rapid drying etc



CRACKING/SPLITTING: It is defect in which the cracks in the films occur across the crown of the tablet (cracking) or splits around the edges of the tablet (Splitting).


Causes occur when the internal stress of the film exceeds the tensile strength of fim, use of high molecular weight polymers.



Links 


http://www.pharmainfo.net/tablet-ruling-dosage-form-years/problems-tablet-manufacture-and-related-remedies/tablet-coating-problems



https://www.lfatabletpresses.com/articles/different-tablet-coating-defects-and-remedies


TABLET PROBLEMS

Problems occuring due to process


CAPPING:- It occur when the upper or lower part of the tablet separates horizontally (partially or complete) from the tablet body and comes off as a cap, during ejection of tablet from the compression machine. 


Causes- over drying of granules, lesser amount of binder, improper tooling, air entrapment.


LAMINATION:- ‘Lamination’ is the separation of a tablet into two or more distinct horizontal layers.


Causes- over speed of turret, improper setting of lower punches, over dried granules.


Problems due to excipients


CHIPPING:- ‘Chipping’ is defined as the breaking of tablet edges during the release of tablet from the press or during handling and coating operations.


Cause - punch tips worn, over drying of granules, lower amount of lubricants.


CRACKING:- When the small and fine cracks observed on the upper and lower central surface of tablets, or sometimes on the sidewalls of tablets are referred to as Cracking.


Causes- over dried granules, large size of granules, tablets expansion.


STICKING:- when the tablet material adhere to the die wall is referred as sticking.
Filming is a slow form of sticking and occur due to excessive moisture in the granules.


Cuses- excessive binder, lesser drying of granules

PICKING:- when a small amount of material from a tablet is sticking and  removed off from the tablet-surface by a punch face is called picking.
The problem is more common on the upper punch faces than on the lower ones.


Cause lesser drying of granules, lesser addition of lubricants, binder addition was high embossing letters on punch tips

MOTTLING:- it is the  unequal distribution of colour on a tablet, with light or dark spots present in an uniform surface.


Causemigration of die to the durface of granules during drying improper mixing of die coloured drug used with colourless excipients

DOUBLE IMPRESSION:- ‘Double Impression’ occur due to free rotation of punches, which have a monogram or other engraving on their face.


Cause - occur due to free rotation of punches

CORRECTIVE ACTION PREVENTIVE ACTION (CAPA)

CAPA is a fundamental management tool that should be used in every quality system.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

A corrective action is a term that encompasses the process of reacting to product problems, customer complaints or other nonconformities and fixing them. The process includes:
(i) Reviewing and defining the problem or nonconformity.
(ii) Finding the cause of the problem.
(iii) Developing an action plan to correct the problem and prevent a recurrence.
(iv) Implementing the plan.
(v) Evaluating the effectiveness of the correction.

PREVENTIVE ACTIONS

A preventive action is a process for detecting potential problems or nonconformance’s and eliminating them. The process includes:
(i) Identify the potential problem or nonconformance.
(ii) Find the cause of the potential problem.
(iii)Develop a plan to prevent the occurrence.
(iv) Implement the plan.
(v) Review the actions taken and the effectiveness in preventing the problem.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTIVE ACTION

The process used for corrective actions and preventive actions is very similar and the steps outlined in this document can be used for either. However, it is important to understand the differences and also be aware of the implications involved in performing and documenting each.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

A corrective action is a reaction to a problem that has already occurred. It assumes that a nonconformance or problem exists and has been reported by either internal or external sources. The actions initiated are intended to: a) fix the problem and b) modify the quality system so that the process that caused it is monitored to prevent a reoccurrence. The documentation for a corrective action provides evidence that the problem was recognized, corrected, and proper controls installed to make sure that it does not happen again.
To address the Corrective Action clause you should be identifying the root cause of non-conformances that have already taken place and implementing immediate corrective actions to contain the situation and long term corrective actions to prevent their re-occurrence.

PREVENTIVE ACTIONS

A preventive action is initiated to stop a potential problem from occurring. It assumes that adequate monitoring and controls are in place in the quality system to assure that potential problems are identified and eliminated before they happen. If something in the quality system indicates that a possible problem is or may develop, a preventive action must be implemented to avert and then eliminate the potential situation. The documentation for a preventive action provides evidence that an effective quality system has been implemented that is able to anticipate, identify and eliminate potential problems.

7 STEPS OF CAPA FOR IMPLEMENTTION

Implementing an effective corrective or preventive action capable of satisfying quality assurance and regulatory documentation requirements is accomplished in seven basic steps:

1- IDENTIFICATION- Clearly define the problem.

The initial step in the process is to clearly define the problem. It is important to accurately and completely describe the situation as it exists now. This should include the source of the information, a detailed explanation of the problem, the available evidence that a problem exists.

This should include:

(a) The source of the information.

The specific source of the information is documented. There are many possible sources: Service requests, Internal Quality Audit, Customer complaints, Internal quality audits, Staff observations, Trend data, QA inspections, Process monitoring, Risk analysis, Process performance monitoring, Management review, and Failure mode analysis. This information is important for the investigation and action plan, but also useful for effectiveness evaluation and communicating the resolution of the problem.

(b) Detailed explanation of the problem

A description of the problem is written that is concise - but complete. The description must contain enough information so that the specific problem can be easily understood.

(c) Documentation of the available evidence that a problem exists.

List the specific information, documents, or data available that demonstrates that the problem does exist. This information will be very important during the investigation into the problem. For example, the evidence for a product defect may be a high percentage of service requests or product returns. The evidence for a potential equipment problem may be steadily increasing downtime.

(d) Corrective/Preventive Action Request form

A sample form is provided “Corrective/Preventive Action Request that can be used to initiate a CAPA action and collect the initial information.

2 - Evaluation - Appraise the magnitude and impact.

The situation must be evaluated to determine both the need for action and then, the level of action required. The potential impact of the problem and the actual risks to the company and/or customers must be determined. Essentially, the reasons that this problem is a concern must be documented.

An evaluation should include:

(a) Potential Impact of the problem

Determine and document specifically why the problem is a concern and what the impact to the company and/or customers may be. Concerns may include costs, function, product quality, safety, reliability, and/or customer satisfaction.

(b) Assessment of Risk

Using the result of the impact evaluation, the seriousness of the problem is assessed. The level of risk that is associated with the problem may affect the actions that are taken. For example, a problem that presents a serious risk to the function or safety of a product may be assigned a high priority and require immediate remedial action. On the other hand, an observation that a particular machine is experiencing an increasing level of downtime each month may have a lower priority.

(c) Remedial Action that may be required

The potential impact and risk assessment may indicate a need for some immediate action to remedy the situation until a permanent solution can be implemented. In some cases the remedial action may be adequate. If so, the CAPA can then be closed, after documenting the rationale for this decision and completing appropriate follow up.

(d) Remedial Action form

A sample “Remedial Action” form is included. This form should be used to explain the steps that must be taken to avoid any further adverse effects.

3 - INVESTIGATION - Make a plan to research the problem.

A written procedure for doing an investigation into the problem is created. A written plan helps assure that the investigation is complete and nothing is missed.

This procedure should include:

(a) The objectives for the action
The objective is a statement of the desired outcome(s) of the corrective or preventive action.
The action will be complete when all aspects of the objective have been met and verified.

(b) An investigation strategy

A set of specific instructions for determining the contributing and root causes of the problem is written.
This procedure directs a comprehensive review of all circumstances related to the problem and must consider: equipment, materials, personnel, procedures, design, training, software, external factors.

(c) Assignment of responsibility and required resources

An important part of the investigation procedure is to assign responsibility for conducting each aspect of the investigation. Any additional resources that may be required is also identified and documented. For example, specific testing equipment or external analysis may be required.

(d) Investigation Procedure form

A sample “Investigation Procedure” form is included. This is a written plan of action for the investigation into the problem. It should include the overall objective and the instructions for conducting the investigation. The person or persons responsible for the investigation and an expected completion date should also be entered.

4 - ANALYSIS - Perform a thorough assessment.

The investigation procedure is used to conduct the investigation into the cause of the problem. The goal of this analysis is primarily to determine the root cause of the problem described, but any contributing causes are also identified.

(a) Every possible cause is identified and appropriate data collected.
A list of all possible causes is created which then form the basis for collecting relevant information, test data, etc.

(b)The necessary data and other information is collected that will be used to determine the primary cause of the problem.
The results of the data collection are documented and organized.
Data may come from a variety of sources: testing results and/or a review of records, processes, service information, design controls, operations, and any other information that may lead to a determination of the fundamental cause of the problem.The data collected is organized into a useable form.The resulting documentation should address all of the possible causes previously determined. This information is used to determine the root cause of the problem. The effectiveness of the analysis will depend on the quality and thoroughness of the information available.

(c) Everything related to the problem must be identified, but the primary goal must be to find the root cause.Use the data to complete a Root Cause Analysis. This involves finding the actual cause of the problem rather than simply dealing with the symptoms. Finding the primary cause is essential for determining appropriate corrective and/or preventive actions.

(d) Problem Analysis form

A sample “Problem Analysis” form is included. This form is optional but is intended to be used for recording information related to the analysis of the problem. The form can be used as a collection point for the information discovered during the analysis and any supporting data or documentation can be attached.

5 - ACTION PLAN - Create a list of required tasks.

Using the results from the analysis, the best method(s) for correcting the situation (or preventing a future occurrence) is determined and act ion plan developed. All of the tasks required to correct the problem and prevent a recurrence are identified and incorporated into an action plan.
The plan includes changes that must be made and assigns responsibility for the tasks. The action plan should also identify the person or persons responsible for completing each task.

(a) Actions to be completed

List all activities and tasks that must be accomplished to correct the existing problem or eliminate a potential problem, and prevent a recurrence. It is very important identify all actions necessary to address everything that contributed to or resulted from the situation.

(b) Document or Specification Changes

Needed changes to documents, processes, procedures, or other system modifications should be described. Enough detail must be included so it is clearly understood what must be done and what the outcome of the changes should be.

(c) Process, Procedure, or System changes

If any changes to processes, procedures, or systems must be made they are described. Enough detail should be included so that it is clearly understood what must be done. The expected outcome of these changes should also be explained.

(d) Employee Training

Employee training is an essential part of any change that is made and should be made part of the action plan. To be effective, all modifications and changes made must be communicated to all persons, departments, suppliers, etc. that were or will be affected.

(e) Action Plan form

A sample “Action Plan” form is included. This should provide a set of written procedures that detail all of the actions that must be done to resolve the problem and prevent it from recurring. This includes corrective and preventive activities, document changes, training, etc. The person or persons responsible and an expected completion date should also be entered on the form.

6 - IMPLEMENTATION - Execute the action plan.

The corrective / preventive action plan that has been created is now implemented. All of the required tasks listed and described in the action plan are initiated, completed, and documented.
Implementation Summary
All of the activities that have been completed as required in the “Action Plan” should be listed and summarized. This section should contain a complete record of the actions thatwere taken to correct the problem and assure that it will not recur. This includes changes, preventive measures, process controls, training, etc.

(a) Documentation

All documents or other specifications that have been modified are listed. Typically the documentation would be attached to a final printed report of this CAPA action. This will facilitate verification of the changes for the follow up.

7 - FOLLOW UP - Verify and assess the effectiveness.

One of the most fundamental steps in the CAPA process is completing an evaluation of the actions that were taken.
This evaluation must not only verify the successful completion of the identified tasks, but also assess the appropriateness and effectiveness of the actions taken.

(a) Key questions

Have all of the objectives been met? (Did the actions correct or prevent the problem with assurances that the same situation will not happen again?)
Have all recommended changes been completed and verified?
Has training and appropriate communications been implemented to assure that all relevant employees understand the situation and the changes that have been made?
Has an investigation demonstrated that that the actions taken have not had any additional adverse effect on the product or service?

(b) Verification results

Make sure that appropriate information has been recorded that provides proof that all actions have been completed successfully.

(c) Validation results

A validation of the action is done. This must document that:
(i) The root cause of the problem has been solved,
(ii) Any resulting secondary situations have been corrected,
(iii) Proper controls have been established to prevent a future occurrence.
(iv) The actions taken had no other adverse effects.
(v) Adequate monitoring of the situation is in place.

COMPLETION

When the Follow Up has been finished, the CAPA is complete. It should be dated, and signed by appropriate, authorized personnel.